|
|
There is No Difference Between
Deuteronomy-Mandated Stoning and Pistol Whipping in Wyoming! Sermon by Brother Harry Harwick I seek answers from the Godly of Landover (not the illiterate, inarticulate pagan demon hackers who now seem to visit here regularly). Matthew Shepard was an acknowledged homosexual. Two men, appalled by his lifestyle, pistol whipped him into unconsciousness and left him to die, strapped to a fence in the freezing Wyoming temperatures. Though we, at Landover, know most so-called Christians are hypocrites,
the
Deuteronomy mandates stoning for a wide variety of sins, ranging from
a woman
Now, I know what some will say -- "Jesus repudiated that principle." That is, of course, utter nonsense, but let's assume, for the sake of argument, that it were true. Regardless of what Jesus said, for thousands of years, sinners were stoned, at God's command. Are we to believe that such violence is heart-wrenching and sickening and warrants the death penalty today, but was just and appropriate for all people then? Furthermore, Jesus NEVER repudiated this principle. Jesus simply said, "Let ye who is free from sin cast the first stone." Jesus simply said that the people around Him (and perhaps people everywhere) weren't worthy of being executioner because they were sinners as well. Presumably, then, if there were someone free from sin, that person would still be under an obligation to stone those who are not. Am I missing something here, or is the sympathy for Matthew Shepard
by people
Copyright
1998-2007, Americhrist Ltd.
All rights reserved. Terms
of Service
|
|